The challenges of inclusivity for students with a criminal history

Authors

  • Sue King University of South Australia

Keywords:

inclusivity, criminal history, students

Abstract

Criminal history checks in Australian social work education are a recent development consistent with international higher education practices and local employment practices. There has been little exploration of the impact other human service educators prior to placing students on field work is a relatively recent development in Australia that reflects the increased use of such checks by human service employers. The use of these checks has the potential to prevent some individuals from undertaking the study program. As such it is an important practice with significant ethical implications for educators. However, despite the debates about the use of criminal record checks in a broad range of contexts (Naylor 2005; Naylor, Paterson et al. 2008) there has been little scrutiny of Australian university practices in this area and indeed the research on which this paper draws demon- strates that there is diversity of practice around Australia with the potential for people with similar criminal histories to have different experiences in different states of Australia.

This paper draws on a review of the practices of social work educators in Australian universities involving qualitative research with 16 Australian Schools of Social Work (or equivalent). Utilising the insights of university staff involved in field education, this paper explores the principles that would guide good practice in the management of criminal history checks in social work education.

References

Apaitia-Vague, T., Pitt, L. and D. Younger (2011) ‘Fit and proper’ and fieldwork: A dilemma for social work educators? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, vol. 23 no. 4, pp. 55-64.

Australian Association of Social Workers (2012) Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS).

Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers.

Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) (1999) Code of Ethics. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers. Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) (2010) Code of Ethics. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers. Brear, P., Dorrian, J., et al. (2008) Preparing our future counselling professionals: Gatekeeping and the implications for research.’

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93-101.

Cowburn, M. and Nelson, P. (2007). Safe recruitment, social justice and ethical practice: Should people who have criminal convictions be allowed to train as social workers? Social Work Education, vol 27, no.3, pp. 293-306.

Crisp, B. R. (2006) Gatekeeping or redressing social exclusion: Expectations on social work educators in relation to incarcerated students. Social Work Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4-10.

Crisp, B. R. and Gillingham, P. (2008). Some of my students are prisoners: Issues and dilemmas for social work educators. Social Work Education, 27(3): 307-317.

Currer, C. (2009) Assessing student social workers’ professional suitability: Comparing university procedures in England. British Journal of Social Work, vol. 39, no 6 pp. 1481-1498.

General Social Care Council. (2012) General Social Care Council. Retrieved 16 December 2012, from http://www.gscc.org.uk/ holding.html.

Health and Care Professions Council. (2012 ) Professional Declaration. Retrieved 20 December 2012, from http://www.hpc-uk. org/registrants/renew/declaration/index.asp.

Health and Care Professions Council. (2012 ) Vetting and Barring. Retrieved 20 December 2012, from http://www.hcpc-uk.org/ aboutregistration/vettingandbarring/.

Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act (2009) (Queensland)

Kean, J. (2007) Professional ethics versus institutional expectations. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, vol. 19, no.2, pp.37-41.

Kennedy, R. and Richards, J. (2007) Integrating Human Service Law and Practice. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Madoc-Jones, I., Bates, J., et al. (2007) Students with criminal convictions: Policies and practices in social work education. British Journal of Social Work, vol. 37, no 8, pp.1387-1403.

Magen, R., H.and Emerman, J. (2000) Should convicted felons be denied admission to a social work education program? Yes!

Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 401-405.

McLaughlin, K. (2010)The social worker versus the General Social Care Council: An analysis of care standards tribunal hearings and decisions. British Journal of Social Work, vol. 40, no.1. : pp. 311-327.

Naylor, B. (2005) Do not pass Go: The impact of criminal record checks on employment in Australia. Alternative Law Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp.174-179.

Naylor, B., Paterson, M., et al. (2008). ‘In the shadow of a criminal record: Proposing a just model of criminal record employment checks.’ Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 32 no. 1, pp.171-198.

Ryan, M., Habibis, D., et al. (1997) Guarding the gates of the profession: Findings of a survey of gatekeeping mechanisms in Australian Bachelor of Social Work programs. Australian Social Work, vol. 50, no.3, pp.5-12.

Scott, N. and Zeiger, S. (2000) Point/Counterpoint - should convicted felons be denied admission to a social work education program? No! Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 36 no. 3, pp. 409-411.

Social Workers Registration Board (New Zealand) (2012) Fit and Proper Person, Policy: Social Workers Registration Board Wellington, NZ. Available at: http://www.swrb.govt.nz/policy

Stevens, M., Manthorpe, J., Martineau, S., Hussein, S., Rapaport, J., and Harris, J. (2010) Making decisions about who should be barred from working with adults in vulnerable situations: The need for social work understanding. British Journal of Social Work, vol. 40, no.1, pp. 290-310.

Tam, D., M.Y and Coleman, H. (2009) Construction and validation of a professional suitability scale for social work practice.

Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 47-63.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-01