Practices to Improve Communication between Birth Parents and Permanent Families
Keywords:
Open Adoption, Contact, Out-of-home Care, PermanencyAbstract
Background: Support to maintain important family relationships is seen as a right for children in permanent care in Australia. In New South Wales, newly legislated permanency principles prioritise open adoption over long-term foster care and require plans for ongoing, face-toface (known as direct) birth family contact for children in permanent placements. Countries with similar child welfare systems do not place the same emphasis on contact after permanent removal and it is especially uncommon to see direct contact given priority in open adoption.
The problem: There is mixed evidence on the benefits of contact for children in permanent care. The quality of the relationship between birth relatives and caregivers is critical to the success of contact. Casework support is key to promoting understanding and communication between children’s birth parents and permanent carers or adoptive parents. The emerging permanency model in New South Wales does not yet have an evidence base and most caseworkers lack the skills to help these families build a constructive relationship in the interests of ongoing contact for children.
The solution: Casework practices developed for use in child welfare placements elsewhere may be successfully applied to New South Wales to help build the practical skills needed to facilitate openness, empathy and respectful interactions. These practices need to be tested and refined to build an evidence base on what works to support ongoing direct contact for children who are permanently removed from parental care.
References
Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS). (2017). Children in care. CFCA Resource Sheet, October. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/children-care
Biehle, K., & Goodman, D. (2012). Icebreaker meetings: A tool for building relationships between birth and foster parents. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Boddy, J., Statham, J., Danielsen, I., Geurts, E., Join‐Lambert, H., & Euillet, S. (2014). Beyond contact? Policy approaches to work with families of looked after children in four European countries. Children & Society, 28(2), 152–161.
Boyle, C. (2017). What is the impact of birth family contact on children in adoption and long-term foster care? A systematic review. Child and Family Social Work, 22, 22–33.
Cashmore, J., & Taylor, A. (2017). Children’s family relationships in out-of-home care. Research Report Number 5. Sydney, NSW: Department of Family and Community Services.
Collings, S., Dew, A., Gordon, T., Spencer, M., & Dowse, L. (2017). Intersectional disadvantage: Exploring differences between
Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parents with intellectual disability in the NSW child protection system. Journal of Public Child Welfare. Early online 21st September. doi:10.1080/15548732.2017.1379456
Commonwealth of Australia. (2011). National standards for out-of-home care. Canberra, ACT: Department of Social Services. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children/news/2011/national-standards-for-out-of-home-care
Corwin, T. (2012). Strategies to increase birth parent engagement, partnership, & leadership in the child welfare system: A review. Casey Family Programs, Seattle, WA. Available at https://tinyurl.com/y7mhtgxg
Crea, T., & Barth, R. (2009). Patterns and Predictors of Adoption Openness and Contact: 14 Years Postadoption. Family Relations 58(5), 607-620 doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00578.x
Frame, L., Conley, A., & Berrick, J. D. (2006). “The real work is what they do together”: Peer support and birth parent change. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87(4), 509–520.
Gerring, C., Kemp, S., & Marcenko, M. (2008). The connections project: A relational approach to engaging birth parents in visitation. Child Welfare, 87(6), 5–30.
Luu, B., Collings, S., Wright, A.C., Pope, S., & Spencer, M. (2018). Open adoption of children in NSW out‐of‐home care: Foster carers’ perceptions about the motivations and barriers. Sydney, Australia: Institute of Open Adoption Studies, The University of Sydney. June 2018
Neil, E., Beek, M., & Ward, E. (2015) Contact after adoption: A longitudinal study of post adoption contact arrangements. Coram.
BAAF: London
Neil, E., Cossar, J., Jones, C., Lorgelly, P., & Young, J. (2011). Supporting Direct Contact after Adoption. BAAF: London
Neil, E., & Howe, D. (2004). Conclusions: A transactional model for thinking about contact, in E. Neil and D. Howe (Eds.). Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory and practice.London: BAAF.
Neil, E., Young, J. and Hartley, L. (2018). A survey of adoptive families: following up children adopted in the Yorkshire and Humberside region. Norwich: CRCF
NSW Family and Community Services (FACS). (2014). OOHC Adoption Strategy – FACS Strategic Conversation, 1 February 2014. Sydney, NSW: New South Wales Government.
NSW Family and Community Services (FACS). (2016). Birth family contact for children in out-of-home-care: What does the Pathways of Care Longitudinal Study tell us? FACSAR: Evidence to Action Note, December. Sydney, NSW: New South Wales Government.
NSW Family and Community Services (FACS). (2017). Their futures matter: A new approach. Reform directions from the Independent Review of Out-of-home Home Care in New South Wales. Sydney, NSW: New South Wales Government.
NSW Family and Community Services (FACS). (2018). Permanency support program. Retrieved from https://www.facs.nsw.gov. au/families/permanency-support-program
NSW Family and Community Services (FACS). (n.d.). Common principles for contact. NSW Government. Retrieved from https:// www.facs.nsw.gov.au/providers/children-families/oohc/resources/chapters/common-principles-for-contact
Ross, N., & Cashmore, J. (2016). Adoption reforms New South Wales style: A comparative look. Australian Journal of Family Law, 30(1), 51–75.
Research in Practice. Contact after Adoption. Available at https://contact.rip.org.uk/
Ross, N., Cocks, J., Johnston, L., & Stoker, L. (2017). “No voice, no opinion, nothing”: Parent experiences when children are removed and placed in care. Research report. Newcastle, NSW: University of Newcastle. Retrieved from http://www.lwb.org.au/ assets/Parent-perspectives-OOHC-Final-Report-Feb-2017.pdf
Ryan, D., Harris, G., Brown, D., Houston, D., Livingston Smith, S., & Howard, J. (2011). Open adoptions in child welfare:
Social worker and foster/adoptive parent attitudes. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(4), 445–466. doi:10.1080/15548732.2011.
Taplin, S., Bullen, S., McArthur, M., Kertesz, M., & Dobbins, T. (2015). KContact, an enhanced intervention for contact between children in OOHC and their parents: Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 15(1) 1134–1134. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2461-3
Tilbury, C., & Osmond, J. (2006). Permanency planning in foster care: A research review and guidelines for practitioners. Australian Social Work, 59(3), 265–280.
Tregeagle, S., Moggach, L., Cox, E., & Voigt, L. (2014). A pathway from long-term care to adoption: Findings from an Australian permanency programme. Adoption & Fostering. 38(2), 115–130. doi:10.1177/0308575914532406 United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations General Assembly. Treaty Series. 1577:3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
