The 7Rs of Field Education

Authors

  • Jenni Graves Prince of Wales Hospital & Sydney/ Sydney Eye Hospital

Keywords:

Field education, Social work supervisor, Student supervision, Learning and development, Social work educator

Abstract

Field education is a priority within the social work profession with organisations and individual supervisors making a significant commitment to students. This article outlines the 7Rs of field education: routine, relationships, ritual, reflection, risk, replenish and rehearse. These 7Rs provide a framework for organisations and for individual field educators when thinking about field education. At any one time, large agencies typically have multiple students, sometimes more field educators (with co-supervisors), and are in the process of field education throughout the year, with pre-placement considerations occurring months prior to day one of placement. The 7Rs of field education can be used as a communication tool or a reference summary when preparing for students or in the midst of field education. The framework sets a context which highlights expected requirements whilst also focusing on the critical processes involved in student supervision: both task and process, both a science and an art. This is a reflective piece by a social work educator, whose role includes supporting social work peers in field education, organising student group learning and development and being a liaison point for students and universities prior to, and during, placements. The framework may also be of use to students and for universities.

References

Barlow, C., & Hall, B. L. (2007). “What about feelings?”: A study of emotion and tension in social work field education. Social Work Education, 26(4), 399–413.

Cleak, H., & Smith, D. (2012). Student satisfaction with models of field placement supervision. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 243–258.

Doyle, K., Sainsbury, K., Cleary, S., Parkinson, L., Vindigni, D., McGrath, I., & Cruickshank, M. (2017). Happy to help/happy to be here: Identifying components of successful clinical placements for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 49, 27–32.

Dunn, S. V., & Burnett, P. (1995). The development of a clinical learning environment scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(6), 1166–1173.

Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–110.

Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111–124.

Henderson, A., Briggs, J., Schoonbeek, S., & Paterson, K. (2011). A framework to develop a clinical learning culture in health facilities: Ideas from the literature. International Nursing Review, 58(2), 196–202.

Henderson, A., Heel, A., & Twentyman, M. (2007). Enabling student placement through strategic partnerships between a health care organization and tertiary institutions. Journal of Nursing Management, 15(1), 91–96.

Jaw, B. S., & Liu, W. (2003). Promoting organizational learning and self renewal in Taiwanese companies: The role of HRM.

Human Resource Management, 42(3), 223–241.

Middlemiss, E. (2017). Keeping the passion alive: Ten years on. Oral presentation, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD) World Social Work Day Forum.

Raschick, M., Maypole, D. E., & Day, P. A. (1998). Improving field education through Kolb learning theory. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 31–42.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.

Tillotson, N. (2017). Focusing on ability. Oral presentation, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD) World Social Work Day Forum.

Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-01