Field Education as Signature Pedagogy – Insights for Australian social work
Keywords:
Social work education, Signature pedagogy, Field education, Social work pedagogyAbstract
Field education has been identified as the signature pedagogy of the profession. Field education is also being said to be in crisis. The attribution of signature pedagogy status is contested as there is limited research where Shulman’s 2005 framework has been applied in its entirety either in the United States or Australia. A review of the literature concerning signature pedagogy in social work highlights an absence of Australian perspectives and contexts. This makes it unclear whether field education is signature pedagogy for the profession in Australia. Further research and professional reflection is required to identify congruence with signature pedagogy status and explore ways in which the curriculum design and pedagogical decision making for schools of social work are responding to pedagogical inertia or are being responsive to the needs of the 21st century and the field.
References
AASW. (2012). Australian social work education and accreditation standards (ASWEAS) (p. 9). Canberra, ACT: Author.
Abram, F., Hartung, M., & Wernet, S. (2000). The Non MSW task supervisor, MSW field instructor, and the practicum student.
Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(1–2), 171–185.
Alexander, R. (2009). Pedagogy, culture and the power of comparison. In H. L. Daniels, & J. Porter, (Eds.), Educational theories, cultures and learning: A critical perspective (pp. 10 - 26). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Bogo, M. (2015). Field education for clinical social work practice: Best practices and contemporary challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(3), 317–324.
Boitel, C. R., & Fromm, L. R. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and the learning contract. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(4), 608–622.
Cornell-Swanson, L. J. (2012). Toward a comprehensive signature pedagogy in social work education. In R. A. R. Gurung (Ed.), Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 203–216). Sterling, UK: Stylus Publishing.
Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://cswe.org/ getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-andPolicies/2008EPAS/2008EDUCATIONALPOLICYANDACCREDITATIONSTAN DARDS(EPAS)-08-24-2012.pdf.aspx
Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards for baccalaureate and master’s social work programs. Retrieved from http://wwwhttp://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-
EPAS/2015EPA
de Warren, D., & Mensinga, J. T. (2004). Innovative social work education across distance: Community focused learning.
Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 6(1), 46–63.
Earls Larrison, T., & Korr, W. S. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206.
Hemy, M., Boddy, J., Chee, P., & Sauvage, D. (2016). Social work students juggling” field placement. Social Work Education, 35(2), 215-228.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., Kuppens, S., & Ferrell, L. W. (2011). The signature pedagogy of social work? An investigation of the evidence. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(3), 363–372.
Holosko, M., & Skinner, J. (2015). A call for field coordination leadership to implement the signature pedagogy. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(3), 275–283. doi:10.1080/10911359.2015.1005519
Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169.
Lyter, S. C. (2012). Potential of field education as signature pedagogy: The field director role. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(1), 179–188.
Miller, S. E. (2010). A conceptual framework for the professional socialization of social workers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(7), 924–938. doi:10.1080/10911351003751934
Morley, C., & Dunstan, J. (2013). Critical reflection: A response to neoliberal challenges to field education? Social Work Education, 32(2), 141–156. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.730141
Pease, B., Fook, J. (1999). Transforming social work practice: Postmodern critical perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
Preston, S., George, P., & Silver, P. (2014). Field education in social work: The need for reimagining, Critical Social Work, 15(1), 57–67. Retrieved from http://
www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/system/files/Preston_George_Silver_2014.pdf
Rosenman, L. (2007). Social work education, the university, and the state. Australian Social Work, 60(1), 5–17. doi:10.1080/03124070601166679
Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2016). Essential research methods for social work. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Shulman, L. (2005a). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, Summer 134(3), 52–59.
Shulman, L. (2005b). Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91(2), 18–25.
Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
