The “Write” Conditions: How to Overcome Writing for Publication Barriers through Academic Development
Keywords:Social work, Human services, Writers' groups, Reflection, Academic development, Writing for publication programs
Writing for publication is an important measure of individual performance for academics. However, academics in the applied disciplines of social work and the human services often struggle to consistently achieve in this area. Professional development programs that facilitate writing for publication are increasingly common; however, these are often one-off endeavours that focus on early-career researchers. We argue that, where academics have practitioner back- grounds, writing for publication programs that teach writing skills and build supportive, collegial writing communities are vital. In this article we reflect on a writing for publication program for social work academics. Our reflections contribute to further understandings about the barriers academics face in terms of writing and how these might be overcome.
Participants in the group identified writing barriers that included time constraints and competing demands; fear and anxiety; and, importantly, a significant disconnection between corporate university agendas and the social justice focus of the discipline. We found that the writing group and the writing retreat increased publication output and the supportive, collegial writing community helped to overcome structural and psychosocial barriers.
These reflections point to there being an imperative to provide structured and institutionally legitimised writing for publication programs for social work and human service academics.
Baldwin, C., & Chandler, G. E. (2002). Improving faculty publication output: the role of a writing coach. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18, 8–15.
Blyth, E., Shardlow, S. M., Masson, H., Lyons, K., Shaw, I., & White, S. (2010). Measuring the quality of peer-reviewed publications in social work: impact factors – liberation or liability? Social Work Education: The International Journal, 29, 120–136.
Boice, R., & Jones, F. (1984). Why academicians don’t write. Journal of Higher Education, 55, 567–582.
Bridges, D., & McGee, S. (2011). Collaborative inquiry: Reciprocity and authenticity. In J. Higgs, A. Titchen, D. Horsfall, & D. Bridges (Eds.), Creative spaces for qualitative researching: Living research (pp. 213–222). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Clegg, S. (2003). Problematising ourselves: Continuing professional development in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 8, 37–50.
Ditton, M. J. (2009). How social relationships influence academic health in the “enterprise university”: An insight into productivity of knowledge workers. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 151–164.
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Frazer, H. (2009). Trying to complete socially just, politically sensitive social work research. Journal of Social Work, 9, 87–98.
Fredman, N., & Doughney, N. (2012). Academic dissatisfaction, managerial change and neo-liberalism. Higher Education, 64, 41–58.
Gair, S. (2012). Documenting practice so we’re all on the same page: Upholding the creativity, power and meaningfulness of writing. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 14, 7–21.
Galligan, L., Cretchley, P., George, L., Martin McDonald, K., McDonald, J., & Rankin, J. (2003). Evolution and emerging trends of university writing groups. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 19, 28–41.
Grant, B. M., & S. Knowles. (2000). Flights of imagination: Academic women be(com)ing writers. International Journal for Academic Development, 5, 6–19.
Green, L. C. (2006). Pariah profession, debased discipline? An analysis of social work’s low academic status and the possibilities for change. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 25, 245–264.
Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2013). A topography of collaboration: Methodology, identity and community in self-study of practice research. Studying Teacher Education, 9, 74–89.
Heron, G., & Murray, R., (2004). The place of writing in social work: Bridging the theory–practice divide. Journal of Social Work, 4, 199–214.
Kvale. S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 187–200.
Lindholm, J. A., Szelenyi, K., Hurtado, S., & Korn, W. S. (2005). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2004– 2005 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.
Littlewood C, Ashton J, Scott E, Mawson S, May S, Walters S. (2013). Developing the SELF study: a focus group with patients and the public. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (20) 200-26.
MacLeod, I., Steckley, L., & Murray, M. (2012). Time is not enough: Promoting strategic engagement with writing for publication. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 641–654.
McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 19–35.
Moore, S. (2003). Writers’ retreats for academics: Exploring and increasing the motivation to write. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 333–342.
Morss, K., & Murray, R. (2001). Researching academic writing within a structured programme: Insights and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 35–52.
Murray, R. (2005). Writing for academic journals. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: Margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 541–553.
Murray, R. (2013). “It’s not a hobby”: Reconceptualizing the place of writing in academic work. Higher Education, 66, 79–91.
Patton. M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology and practice.
London, UK: Springer.
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. London, England: Harvard University Press.
Webster, M. (2013). Online learning: How a course for frontline managers became a virtual community of practice. Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education, 15, 7–25
Wood, F. (1982).Use and Perception of an Academic Library: A Survey at the Australian National University. Canberra: Australian National University, Academic libraries.
Copyright (c) 2015 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.