Getting the Most out of Electronic Portfolios: Pedagogy and Benefits
Keywords:
Distance learning, E-learning, Higher education, Portfolios, Reflection, Online learning, PedagogiesAbstract
The benefits of using electronic portfolios (e-portfolios) in social work education have been well recognised. Yet, as technology advances, their potential outstrips the initial, relatively modest goals of producing summative documents. The latest version of PebblePad facilitates the creation of a personalised online learning environment – one product of which can be an e-portfolio – that facilitates a wide range of reflective learning activities. This conceptual article discusses the rationale for embedding such a learning environment and e-portfolio generator at the core of a new Master of Social Work (Professional Qualifying) degree. In applying social constructivist pedagogy, it explores how e-portfolio technology can support the construction of knowledge and meaning-making in a social environment, including the facilitation of skills in critical reflection. It is argued that this technology can enable collaborative learning and professional socialisation, build capacity to respond to complexity and uncertainty in practice situations, and help in making sense of, and articulating, a social work identity. Key challenges include a lack of empirical data supporting the use of this technology, adjusting to the requirements of employing new technology, and modifying staff work- loads to reflect different modes of teaching and learning.
References
Altshuler, S., & Bosch, L. (2003). Problem-based learning in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23, 201–215.
Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2012). Australian social work education accreditation standards. Canberra, ACT: Author.
Ayala, J. S. (2009). Blended learning as a new approach to social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 277–288.
Bolinger, A. R., & Stanton, J. V. (2014). The gap between perceived and actual learning from group reflection. Small Group Research, 45(5), 539–567.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bozalek, V., & Matthews, L. (2010). E-learning: A cross-institutional forum for sharing socio-cultural influences on personal and professional identity. International Social Work, 52, 235–246.
Carter, I., Barrett, B., & Park, W. (2011). Improving collaborative teaching in large introductory BSW classes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 569–578.
Chen, C., Feng, R., & Chiou, A. (2009). Vygotsky’s perspective applied to problem-based learning in nursing education. Fu-Jen Journal of Medicine, 7(3), 141–147.
Clarke, D., Litchfield, C., & Drinkwater, E. (2010). Supporting exercise science students to respond to the challenges of an authentic work-integrated learning (WIL) assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 12(3), 153–167.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York, NY: Heath & Co.
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results?: A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40, 312–331.
Fitch, D., Peet, M., Glover Reed, B., & Tolman, R. (2008). The use of ePortfolios in evaluating the curriculum and student learning. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 37–54.
Gallagher, S. A., Stepian, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.
Graham, G., & Megarry, B. (2005). The social care work portfolio: An aid to integrated learning and reflection in social care training. Social Work Education, 24, 769–780.
Halstead, A., & Wheeler, A. (2009). Enhancing reflective professional practice through the use of an ePortfolio: A UK case study. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/ halstead.pdf
Hutchings, P. (1998). Defining features and significant functions of the course portfolio. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning (pp. 13–18). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Killen, R. (2003). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (3rd ed.). Tuggerah, NSW: Social Science Press.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Lawrence, S., & Mazur Abel, E. (2013). Comparing outcomes of a web-based course to face-to-face class outcomes: Implications for social work education. Social Work Education, 32(6), 762–772.
Liu, C. H., & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386–399.
Margolis, L. H., Stevens, R., Laraia, B., Ammerman, A., Harlan, C., Dodds, J., … Pollard, M. (2000). Educating students for community-based partnerships. Journal of Community Practice, 7(4), 21–34.
Morley, C. (2015). Critical reflexivity and social work practice. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 281–286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Okech, D., Barner, J., Segoshi, M., & Carney, M. (2014). MSW student experiences in online vs. face-to-face teaching formats?
Social Work Education, 33(1), 121–134.
O’Sullivan, P. S., Reckase, M. D., McClain, T., Savidge, M. A., & Clardy, J. A. (2004). Demonstration of portfolios to assess competency of residents. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 309–323.
PebblePad. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.pebblepad.com.au/pp3.asp
Petracchi, H. E., & Patchner, M. A. (2000). Social work students and their learning environment: A comparison of interactive television, face-to-face instruction, and the traditional classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 335–346.
Rosegrant Alvarez, A., & Moxley, D. (2004). The student portfolio in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24, 87–103.
Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schatz, M. S., & Simon, S. (1999). The portfolio approach for generalist social work practice: A successful tool for students in field education. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 5, 99–107.
Sidell, N. (2003). The course portfolio: A valuable teaching tool. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 91–106.
Siegel, E., Jennings, J. G., Conklin, J., & Napoletano Flynn, S. A. (1998). Distance learning in social work education: Results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 71–80.
Spicuzza, F. J. (2000). Portfolio assessment: Meeting the challenge of a self-study. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 5, 113–126.
Teghe, D., & Knight, B. A. (2004). Neo-liberal higher education policy and its effects on the development of online courses.
Campus-Wide Information Systems, 21(4), 151–156.
Thompson, L. J. (2005, December). Professional change agents and practice wisdom: Developing rich learning environments which promote capability, confidence and commitment. Paper presented at Social Change in the Twenty-first Century conference. Centre for Social Change Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
Thompson, L. J., & West, D. (2013). Professional development in the contemporary educational context: Encouraging practice wisdom. Social Work Education, 32, 118–133.
Toepell, A. R., Cole, N. D., & Lanthrop, A. H. (2002). The high touch classroom: Small group learning in large class contexts.
Academic Exchange, 6, 11–15.
Vapalahti, K., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2013). Online and face-to-face role-play simulations in promoting social work students’ argumentative problem-solving. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 8(1). Retrieved from http://jcsw.no/local/media/ jcsw/docs/jcsw_issue_2013_1_02_article.pdf
van Huizen, P., van Oers, B., & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 267–290.
Volland, P. J., Berkman, B., Phillips, M., & Stein, G. (2003). Social work education for health care: Addressing practice competencies. Social Work in Health Care, 37(4), 1–17.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. & Trans.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armark, NY: Sharpe.
Waldman, J., & Rafferty, J. (2008). Technology-supported learning and teaching in social work in the UK: A critical overview of the past, present and possible futures. Social Work Education, 27, 581–591.
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739.
Welsh, M. (2012). Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self- and peer-based formative assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21, 57–83.
Young, S., & Delves, L. (2009). Expanding to fix the (blog) space: Enhancing social work education through online technologies. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/ procs/young.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
