WINGS to Fly: What can be Learned from the Evaluation of a Programme for Supporting Children’s Social and Emotional Wellbeing and the Resulting Knowledge Partnership?

Jennifer  Cartmel; Debbie  Miller; Hyacinth  Udah; Paul  Harris; Kerry  Smith

Authors

Jennifer Cartmel Social Work and Human Services, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-7851
Debbie Miller Pathways to Resilience Trust, Queensland, Australia
Hyacinth Udah Social Work and Human Services, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-5596
Paul Harris Social Work and Human Services, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-9616
Kerry Smith Social Work and Human Services, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-1680

Keywords:

Early childhood, Social and emotional wellbeing, Self-regulation, Professional development, Realistic evaluation, Knowledge partnership

Abstract

This article describes the partnership between Pathways to Resilience Trust and human services and social work educators at Griffith University during the evaluation of the WINGS to Fly programme in Queensland, Australia. WINGS is a professional development programme to support educators in early years services to improve outcomes for children from birth to five years of age. Designed as a strengths-based approach, WINGS encourages educators to bring a curiosity to their practice, and to notice the impact of their interactions and communication on children developing social and emotional skills. The pilot was examined based on realist evaluation principles. The findings suggest the training and resources provided to educators acted as facilitating mechanisms that improved their skills and capacity to support children’s social and emotional learning and a greater sense of wellbeing. The learnings from this programme and the partnerships established laid the foundation for a more formalised knowledge partnership. This knowledge partnership extended to the development, implementation and evaluation of youth-oriented programmes based on the key concepts of the Neurosequential Model in Education to further explore what works and how service models in human services are evolving, and in turn, influence social work teaching and research activities.

References

Australian Early Development Census. (2015). Australian early development census national report 2015: A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aedc.gov.au/Websilk/Handlers/ResourceDocument.ashx?id=45cf2664-db9a-6d2b-9fad-ff0000a141dd

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing: Development of a children’s headline indicator. Paddington, NSW: Author.

Be You. (2019). History of be you. Retrieved from https://beyou.edu.au/history

Bretherton, T. (2010). Developing the childcare workforce: Understanding “fight” or “flight” amongst workers. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED510849

Cargo, M., & Warner, L. (2013). “Realist evaluation” in action: A worked example of the Aboriginal parental engagement program. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/2013/12/05/realist-evaluation-in-action-a-worked-example-of-the-aboriginal-parentalengagement-

program

Centre for Community Child Health. (2018). Child mental health: A time for innovation, policy brief number 29. Parkville, Victoria: Murdoch Children’s Research Institute/The Royal Children’s Hospital.

Cheyne, H., Abhyankar, P., & McCourt, C. (2013). Empowering change: Realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth. Midwifery, 29(10), 1110–1121.

Council of Australian Governments. (2009). National quality standard for early childhood education and care and school age care. Canberra, ACT: Author.

Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The ‘most significant change’ (MSC) technique: A guide to its use. Retrieved from https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/resources/guides/most_significant_change

Davis, E., Priest, N., Davies, B., Smyth, L., Waters, E., Herrman, H., & Williamson, L. (2011). Family day care educators: An exploration of their understanding and experiences promoting children’s social and emotional wellbeing. Early Child Development and Care, 182(9), 1193–1208.

Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.

Emerging Minds. (2019). About. Retrieved from https://emergingminds.com.au/about/

Farrell, P., & Travers, T. (2005). A healthy start: Mental health promotion in early childhood settings. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 4 (2), 98–107.

Funnell, S., & Rogers, P. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Groeneveld, M., Vermeer, H., van IJzendoorn, M., & Linting, M. (2012). Caregivers’ cortisol levels and perceived stress in homebased and center-based childcare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 166–175.

Gable, S., Rothrauff, T., Thornburg, K., & Mauzy, D. (2007). Cash incentives and turnover in center-based child care staff. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(3), 363–378.

Hall, J., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2009). The role of pre-school quality in promoting resilience in the cognitive development of young children. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 331–352.

Heyeres, M., Perera, N., Udah, H., Attakey, A., Whiteside, M., & Tsey, K. (2020). Interventions targeting the wellbeing of young people of migrant and refugee backgrounds: A systematic review of the literature. SageSubmissions. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.12401414.v1

Irvine, S., Thorpe K., & McDonald, P. (2018). Low-paid “women’s work”: Why early childhood educators are walking out. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/low-paid-womens-work-why-early-childhood-educators-are-walking-out-91402

Keegan, L., Cartmel, J. & Harris, P. (2020). I’ve changed, I’m smarter: Empowering youth to thrive Neurosequential approach to employment, education and training outcomes for youth. Children and Teenagers, 3(1), 16–32.

Kendall-Taylor, N. & Lindland, E. (2013). Modernity, morals, and more information: Mapping the gaps between expert and public understandings of early child development in Australia. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.

Lawrence, D., Johnson, S., Hafekost, J., Boterhoven De Haan, K., Sawyer, M., Ainley, J., & Zubrick, S. (2015). The mental health of children and adolescents. Report on the second Australian child and adolescent survey of mental health and wellbeing. Canberra: Department of Health.

Marchal, B., Van Belle, S., & Westhorp, G. (2015). Realist evaluation. Retrieved from http://betterevaluation.org/en/approach/realist_evaluation

Melhuish, E. (2016). Parents have the biggest influence over their child’s language and emotional development. Retrieved from http://

theconversation.com/parents-have-the-biggest-influence-over-their-childs-language-and-emotional-development-55823

Mitchell, L., Wylie, C., & Carr, M. (2008). Outcomes of early childhood education: Literature review. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

Nolan, A., Morrissey, A., & Dumenden, I. (2013). Expectations of mentoring in a time of change: Views of new and professionally isolated early childhood teachers in Victoria. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(2), 161–171.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realist evaluation. London: Sage Publications.

Perry, B. (2006). Applying principles of neurodevelopment to clinical work with maltreated and traumatized children: The neurosequential model of therapeutics. In N. B. Webb (Ed.), Working with traumatized youth in child welfare: social work practice with children and families (pp. 27–52). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Perry, B. (2016). The brain science behind student trauma. Education Week, 36(15), 28–29.

Productivity Commission. (2011). Early childhood development workforce. Research report. Melbourne, Victoria: Author.

Productivity Commission. (2018). Early childhood education and care. Research report. Melbourne Victoria: Author.

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. London, UK: William Heinemann.

Shanker, S., & Barker, T. (2018) Help your child deal with stress—and thrive: The transformative power of self-regulation. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Statham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: A brief overview. Loughborough, UK: Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.cwrc.ac.uk/ documents/CWRC_Briefing_paper.pdf

Whitebook, M., & Ryan, S. (2011). Degrees in context: Asking the right questions about preparing skilled and effective teachers of young children. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

World Health Organisation. (2018). Mental health: Strengthening our response. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response

WINGS to Fly

What can be Learned from the Evaluation of a Programme for Supporting Children’s Social and Emotional Wellbeing and the Resulting Knowledge Partnership?

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

Current Issue

Information