Online learning: How a course for front line managers became a virtual community of practice


  • Michael Webster University of Auckland


virtual community of practice, constructivist learning


Tertiary educators in allied health, human service and social work face the challenge of integrating academic courses with workplace realities. This paper describes how interactive processes between participants in an online graduate course for frontline managers contri- buted to the creation of a virtual community of practice bridging the academic– workplace divide. Participants built a community of practice as they engaged in constructivist learning in a place of online safety. The paper identifies the benefits of, barriers to, and critical success factors for, a virtual community of practice (Gannon-Leary and Fontainha 2007). Complex adaptive leadership actions required to successfully develop a virtual community are consid- ered. The paper concludes that combining online and face-to-face elements provide the optimal opportunity for a functioning community of practice.


Adams, J. (2010) The soft-skills learning triangle: A learning model for supporting online management & leadership development. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol.21, no.4, pp.437-463.

Aguirre, R. T. P. and Mitschke, D. B. (2010) Enhancing learning and learner satisfaction through the use of WebCT in social work education. Social Work Education, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 847-860.

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. and Berdahl, J. L. (2000) Groups as complex systems: Overview of the theory. In Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 33-57.

Askeland, G. and Payne, M. (2007) Distance education and international social work education. European Journal of Social Work, vol. 10, no.2, pp. 161 - 174.

Baker, J. D. (2004) An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, vol.7, no. 1, pp. 1-13. Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education, London: Routledge.

Bates, T. (2008) Transforming distance education through new technologies. In Evans, T. Haughey, M. and Murphy, D.

International Handbook on Distance Education. Bingley, England: Emerald, pp. 217-235.

Bell, B. S.and Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002) A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 14-49.

Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Retrieved 15 January 2013from the World Wide Web: orglearning.html.

Brown, R. (2001) The process of community-building on distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 18-35.

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2008). Fundaments of trust management in the development of virtual communities.

Management Research News, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 324-338.

Colachico, D. P. (2010) Creating and sustaining community in a virtual environment. In J. Martin, J. and Hawkins, L., Information communication technologies for human services education and delivery: Concepts and cases. Hershey, PA : Information Science Reference. pp. 105-116.

Cook-Craig, P. and Sabah, Y. (2009) The role of virtual communities of practice in supporting collaborative learning among social workers. British Journal of Social Work, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 725-739. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp048

Crotty, M. (2003) The Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

di Gregorio, S. and Davidson, J. (2008) Qualitative research design for software users. Maidenhead: Open University Press; McGraw-Hill. Dixon, J. (2000) Evaluation tools for flexible delivery, Melbourne: TAFE Frontiers.

Dubé, L., Bourhis, A. and R.Jacob (2006) Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, vol.1, pp.69-93.

Follett, M. P. (1995) Power. In Graham, P., Mary Parker Follett – Prophet of Management, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 97-119.

Fook, J.and Askeland, G. A. (2007) Challenges of critical reflection: Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Social Work Education: The International Journal, vol. 26, no.5, pp. 520 - 533.

Gannon-Leary, P. and Fontainha, E. (2007) Communities of practice and virtual learning communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors. Barriers and Success Factors, eLearning Papers, (5). Retrieved 15 January 2013 from the World Wide Web: www.

Gardner, F. (2006) Working with human service organisations: Creating connections for practice. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Gibson, C. and Manuel, J. (2003) ‘Building trust: Effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams’. In Gibson,C.B. and Cohen, S.G., Virtual teams that work. San Francisco: Wiley. pp.59-86.

Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 191-215.

Hall, E. T. (1989) Beyond culture, New York: Anchor Books.

Hofstede, G. (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42-63.

Jarvis, P. (2009) Learning to be a person in society. Abingdon, England; New York: Routledge.

Johnson, B. (1992) Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.

Kennedy, J. C. (2008) Leadership and culture in New Zealand. In Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C. & House, R. J. Culture and leadership across the World: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 397-429.

Kerno, S. (2008) Limitations of communities of practice: A consideration of unresolved issues and difficulties in the approach,

Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69-78. doi:10.1177/1548051808317998 King, A. (1993) From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 30-35.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge England, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, D.and Allan, B. (2005) Virtual learning communities: A guide for practitioners. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill Education.

Lewis, L., Koston, Z., Quartley, M. and Adsit, J. (2010) ‘Virtual communities of practice: Bridging research and practice using Web 2.0’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 155-161.

Moore, B. (2008) Using technology to promote communities of practice (CoP) in social work education. Social Work Education, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 592-600.

OECD (2012) OECD Employment Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing.

Padgett, D. (2008) Qualitative methods in social work research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Roberts, J. (2006) Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, vol.43, no.3, pp. 623-63. Schön, D. A. (1983) The Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. and McKelvey, B. (2007) Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 298-318.

Weld, N. and Appleton, C. (2008) Walking in people’s worlds: A Practical and philosophical guide to social work. North Shore, Sydney: Pearson Education.

Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. The Systems Thinker, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1-10.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A Guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wlodkowski, R., and Ginsberg, M. (1995) Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, 82-91.