What is left of the person-centred approach in the Anthropocene?
Rogerian and neoliberal ideologies informing human service delivery and education
Keywords:
Anthropocene, neoliberalism, Rogerian person-centred approach, human services workers, human service educationAbstract
“What is a person?” ask Short et al. (2018) when they embark on a cross-disciplinary investigation around notions of personhood and how these apply to field education. This article affirms the significance of this investigation in light of the Anthropocene, which con- fronts people across the globe with ethical questions as to how, and for what purposes, we do the work we do. Human beings have taken over and transformed the world as if we are disconnected from it. The “person-centred approach” is widely adopted in human services work and promoted in government discourse, but the definition of “personhood” remains unclear. Moreover, there are two opposing poles of thought that influence the definition of personhood and person-centred care. To date, the literature has been silent around these opposing thought-systems. After a discussion on the need for practitioners and educators engaged in human services industries to reflect on those opposing perspectives in light of the Anthropocene, this paper homes in on the philosophical incongruities between the neoliberal idea of person-centredness and the original, Rogerian notion of person-centred care, to provoke dialogue in the community around the purpose and ways of doing human services work.
References
Apple, M. W. (2010). Global crises, social justice, and education. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Global crises, social justice, and education
(pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
Apple, M. W. (2011). Democratic education in neoliberal and neoconservative times. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(1), 21–31.
AASW (2011). Health reform position paper. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers.
Australian Association of Social Workers. (2019). World Social Work Day 2019. Australian Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.aasw.asn.au/social-policy-advocacy/world-social-work-day-2019
Ball, S. (2018). Commercialising education: Profiting from reform! Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 587–589.
Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
Bazzano, M. (2010). A true person of no status: notes on Zen and the art of existential therapy. Existential Analysis, 21(1), 51–62.
Bazzano, M. (2016). The conservative turn in person-centered therapy. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 15(4), 339–355. doi:10.1080/14779757.2016.1228540
Bernert, C. (2018). Who am I? Understanding the self, karma, rebirth and dependent arising, fundamentals of Buddhist thought: Introduction series. Kathmandu, Nepal: Chodung Karmo.
Biles, D. (2016). Reapproaching Rogers: Looking to the source to show us where we are going wrong. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 15(4), 318–338. doi:10.1080/14779757.2016.1228539
Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London, UK: Routledge.
Bohm, D., & Edwards, S. (1991). Changing consciousness: Exploring the hidden source of the social, political, and environmental crises facing our world. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
Bollier, D. (2017). George Monbiot on the commons. Resilience.org. Retrieved from https://www.resilience.org/ stories/2017-12-15/george-monbiot-on-the-commons/
Bredewold, F., Kampen, T., Verplanke, L. Tonkens, E., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2016). Een mooie gedachte: Wat professional denken over zelfredzaamheid en wat ze vervolgens (niet) doen [A nice thought: What professionals think about self-reliance and what they (fail to) do]. Amsterdam/Utrecht: University of Amsterdam, University of Humanistics.
Chang, K. Y. (2017). “Slowness” in the Anthropocene: Ecological medicine in refuge and God’s hotel. Neohelicon, 44(2), 331– 345. doi:10.1007/s11059-017-0397-6
Community Services and Health Industry Skills Council (Ed). (2015). Disability behaviour support skill set learner resource suite, learner workbook, CHC08. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.
Community Services and Health Industry Skills Council. (2016). CHCDIS006 Develop and promote positive person-centred behaviour supports. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: an essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.
Davies, B. (2018). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the “post” philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 113–127.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Embodied women at work in neo-liberal times and places. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.),
Doing collective biography (pp. 61–78). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Department of Education and Training. (2016). About training.gov.au. Retrieved from https://training.gov.au/Home/About Dimitrov, V. (n.d.). Self-organization and creativity. Retrieved from http://www.zulenet.com/vladimirdimitrov/pages/creativity.html Dowling, S., Manthorpe, J., & Cowley, S. (2006). Person-centred planning in social care. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Edwards, D. B. Jr., & Klees, S. J. (2015). Unpacking ‘‘participation’’ in development and education governance: A framework of perspectives and practices. Prospects, 45(4), 483–499.
Edwards, M., Biloslavo, R., Kwaymullina, B., & Kwaymullina, A. (2013). Big picture wisdom: Metatheorising ancient, scientific and indigenous wisdom perspectives for global environmental leadership. Journal of Spirituality, Leadership, and Management, 7(1). doi:10.15183/slm2013.07.1113
Fopp, R. (2009). Metaphors in homelessness discourse and research: Exploring “pathways”, “careers” and “safety nets”. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(4), 271–291.
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., & Gemenne, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch. London, UK: Routledge.
Innes, A., Macpherson, S., & McCabe, L. (2006). Promoting person-centred care at the front line. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Joye, S. R. (2016). The Pribram-Bohm holoflux theory of consciousness: An integral interpretation of the theories of Karl Pribram, David Bohm, and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (unpublished doctoral dissertation), California Institute of Integral Studies.
Kendrick, M. J. (1997). The leadership challenge of service quality. Interaction, 11(1), 12–25.
Kendrick, M. J. (2007). Valued social roles and the necessity of values based leadership. The SRV Journal, 2(1), 22-24. Kendrick, M. J. (2008). Key dimensions of quality in individualised lifestyles and support. Interactions, 22(4), 2–7.
Kendrick, M. J. (2011, Sept 15-16?. “Getting a good life”: The challenges for agency transformation so that they are more person centered. Paper presented at Conference on Agency Transformation: The Disability Sub-Conference of the International Initiative on Mental Health Leadership (IIMHL), San Francisco, California, USA.
Kendrick, M. J. (2012). As the years pass: Reflections on the last twenty-five years and looking forward. Interaction, 25(3), 6–15. Kinsella, P. (2000). What are the barriers in relation to person centred planning? London, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Kirkman, M. (2010). Literature review: Person-centred approaches to disability service provision. Melbourne, VIC: School of Population Health, University of Melbourne.
Kirschenbaum, H. (2012). “What is “person-centered”? A posthumous conversation with Carl Rogers on the development of the person-centered approach. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 11(1), 14–30.
Kirschenbaum, H., & Jourdan, A. (2005). The current status of carl rogers and the person-centered approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(1), 37–51.
Krishnamurti, J., & Bohm, D. (1985). The ending of time. London, UK: Gollancz.
Lorimer, J. (2017). The Anthropo-scene: A guide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science, 47(1), 117–142. doi:10.1177/0306312716671039
McLeod, K., & Benn, S. (2019). The Anthropocene transition project. UTS Business School. Retrieved from https://www.uts. edu.au/about/uts-business-school/our-research/hub-sustainable-enterprise/anthropocene-transition-project
Misra, J., Woodring, J., & Merz, S. N. (2006). The globalization of care work: Neoliberal economic restructuring and migration policy. Globalizations, 3(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/14747730600870035
Monbiot, G. (2016, Nov. 14. Neoliberalism: The deep story that lies beneath Donald Trump’s triumph; How a ruthless network of super-rich ideologues killed choice and destroyed people’s faith in politics. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup. com/apps/doc/A470117600/AONE?u=cqu&sid=AONE&xid=e817fddf.
Monbiot, G. (2018). Future to fight for. Retrieved from https://audioboom.com/posts/7025453-5-george-monbiot
Morley, C., Macfarlane, S., & Ablett, P. (2017). The neoliberal colonisation of social work education: A critical analysis and practices for resistance. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 19(2), 25–40.
Murphy, D., Duggan, M., & Joseph, S. (2013). Relationship-based social work and its compatibility with the person-centred approach: Principled versus instrumental perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 703–719.
National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. (2018). The future of Australian higher education: A synthesis of recent research and policy reports with implications for student equity. Perth, WA: Author.
Negussi, T. (2014). The shaky premise of authoritarianism. Retrieved from https://addisstandard.com/the-shaky-premise-of- authoritarianism/
Oriel, E. (2014). Whom would animals designate as “persons”? On avoiding anthropocentrism and including others. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 24(3), 44–59.
Parcell, C., & Jones, A. (2014). Bold reform or policy overreach? Australia’s attack on homelessness: 2008–2013. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(4), 427–443.
Percy, I. (2008). Awareness and authoring: The idea of self in mindfulness and narrative therapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 10(4), 355–367. doi:10.1080/13642530802577109
Raffnsøe, S., Gudmand-Høyer, M., & Morten S., & Thaning, M. S. (2016). The (neo)liberal art of governing. In S. Raffnsøe,
M. Gudmand-Høyer, & M. S. Thaning (Eds.), Michel Foucault: A research companion (pp. 280–323). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Rinpoche, L. C. (2013). Taming the elephant mind: A hand book on the theory and practice of calm abiding meditation. Canberra, ACT: Gorum Publications.
Robinson, N. A. (2014). Fundamental principles of law for the anthropocene? Environmental Policy and Law, 44 (1–2), 13–27. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client centered therapy. London, UK: Constable & Robinson.
Rogers, C. R. (1963). Towards a science of the person. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 3(2), 72–92. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
Rogers, C. R. (1973). Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. In C. R. Rogers & B. Stevens (Eds.), Person to person: The problem of being human. A new trend in psychology (pp. 13–28). London, UK: Souvenir Press.
Rogers, C. R. (1989). A client-centered/person-centered approach to therapy. In H. Kirschenbaum & V. Henderson (Eds.), The Carl Rogers reader (pp. 135–152). Boston, MA: Houghton Miflin.
Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Scerra, N. (2011). Strengths-Based Pactice: The Evidence, A Discussion Paper. Parramatta, NSW: UnitingCare Children, Young People and Families; Research and Program Development Social Justice Unit.
Skaife, S., & Hsu, T-w. L. (2019). Editorial. ATOL: Art Therapy OnLine, 10(1), 1–6.
Short, M., Dempsey, K., Ackland, J., Rush, E., Heller, E., & Dwyer, H. (2018). What is a person? Deepening students’ and colleagues’ understanding of person-centredness. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 20(1), 139–156.
Sorokin, P. (2017). Making global sociology in the context of neoliberal domination: Challenges, ideology and possible strategies.
Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 21–42. doi:10.1177/1360780417743873
Stanhope, V., Henwood, B. F. & Padgett, D. K. (2009). Understanding service disengagement from the perspective of case managers. Psychiatric Services, 60, 459–464.
Stubblefield, C. (2018). Managing the planet: The anthropocene, good stewardship, and the empty promise of a solution to ecological crisis. Societies, 8(2). doi:10.3390/soc8020038
Szasz, T. (1967). Moral man: A model of man for humanistic psychology. In J. F. T. Bugenthal (Ed.), Challenges of humanistic psychology (pp. 45-52). New York, NY: McGrawHill.
Timmerman, G. (2018). Meer zelfredzaamheid, minder overheid?: Neoliberalisme in zorg en welzijn [More self-reliance, less government?: Neoliberalism in care and welfare]. Waardenwerk, 73, 44–56.
Tronto, J. C. (2013a). Preface. In Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice (pp. ix–xv). New York, NY: NYU Press.
Tronto, J. C. (2013b). Vicious circles of privatized caring: Care, equality, and democracy. In Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice (pp. 95–113). New York, NY: NYU Press.
Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity. Sociological Forum, 25(2), 197– 220.
Walker, D. E. (1956). Carl Rogers and the nature of man. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 3(2), 89–92. Wood, J.K. (1998). Carl Rogers and transpersonal psychology. The Person-Centred Journal, 5(1), 3-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
