Structuring the Blended Learning Environment: Pedagogical and Technological Challenges
Keywords:
Online Pedagogy, Management of Professionals, Communities of Practice, Constructivist TeachingAbstract
This paper critically reflects on the challenges and opportunities afforded by a blended course designed to develop knowledge and skills for frontline and mid-level managers in human service organisations, including social work agencies. Drawing on constructivist pedagogy, the authors paint a picture of how course aims, learning objectives and outcomes enabled and advanced participants’ ability to better manage workplace teams. They underpin this narrative through the application of Shulman’s (1986, 2013) Pedagogical Content Knowledge model to the online context and analyse how students utilised new knowledge and skills in their workplace responsibilities. Insights from Susskind and Susskind’s (2015) examination of technological impacts on professional practice are also applied.
This critical reflection is located in an online professional learning community, facilitating the integration of workplace realities and an academic study programme. The experience demonstrates the benefits of a constructive alliance between two educators (an educational designer and an academic course director) with a common vision to create an environment in which the demands of leadership and management of complex human and health service agencies benefit from pedagogical expertise and academic knowledge. The authors suggest that lessons derived from that journey provide useful tools for advancing professional programmes designed for practitioners.
References
Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd ed., pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2013). A universally designed for learning (UDL) infused technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) practitioners’ model essential for teacher preparation in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48 (2), 245–265.
Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2015). Intersection and impact of universal design for learning (UDL) and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) on twenty-first century teacher preparation: UDL-infused TPACK practitioner’s model. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological pedagogical content knowledge exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pp. 287–304). London, England: Springer.
Bower, M. (2011). Synchronous collaboration competencies in web conferencing environments – their impact on the learning process. Distance Education, 32(1), 63–83. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565502
Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1344
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. In P. Goodyear,
S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (Vol. 4, pp. 1-10). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2013). The analysis of complex learning environments. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.),
Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (2nd ed., pp. 49–63). New York, NY: Routledge.
Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report.
Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(1), 65–72.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 87–96.
House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10.
Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in society. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2012). Strategies for engaging learners in a blended environment: Summary report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa – The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
Kellsey, D., & Taylor, A. M. L. (2017). The LearningWheel: A model of digital pedagogy. St Albans, England: Critical Publishing. King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? The Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
LaMendola, W., Ballantyne, N., & Daly, E. (2009). Practitioner networks: Professional learning in the twenty-first century.
British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), bcp023. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp023
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge.
Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moore, B. (2008). Using technology to promote communities of practice (CoP) in social work education. Social Work Education, 27(6), 592–600
Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E. L., & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self- determination theory perspective. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 223–244). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Shulman, L. S. (2013). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Journal of Education, 193(3), 1–11. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). London, England: Sage.
Singh, H. (2006). Blending learning and work: Real-time work flow learning. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 474–490). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Webster, M. (2013). Online learning: How a course for frontline managers became a virtual community of practice. Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education, 15(2), 7–25.
Webster, M. (2017). Social work leadership for Aotearoa New Zealand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Woods, C. (2011). Reflections on pedagogy: A journey of collaboration. Journal of Management Education, 35(1), 154–167. doi:10.1177/1052562910384936
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
