Four Principles of Good Assessment Practice: A Teaching and Learning Approach to Designing and Assessing Student Work
Keywords:Social work education, Assessment, Student learning, Curriculum
Assessment is central to student learning in social work education. In professionally accredited programs such as social work, assessment must address professional standards in relation to curriculum and student outcomes. Thus, considered attention to the way assessments function is an important part of academic work and curriculum design. This paper reports on the results of a sub-set of a larger curriculum project, in which the authors undertook a comprehensive assessment mapping of a social work curriculum in an Australian university. The paper here focuses specifically on the results of focus groups undertaken with social work students and academics on their perceptions and experiences of assessment. We utilise this focus group data to present four principles of good assessment practice that can be used to guide a teaching and learning approach to curriculum development and pedagogy as it
relates to student assessment in higher education.
Adams, J., & McNab, N. (2013). Understanding arts and humanities students’ experiences of assessment and feedback. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(1), 36–52. doi:10.1177/1474022212460743
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2013). Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS). Canberra, ACT: Authors.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Bergenhenegouwen, G. (1987). Hidden curriculum in the university. Higher Education, 16(5), 535–543.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39–55. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642839
Boitel, C. R., & Fromm, L. R. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and the learning contract. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(4), 608–622. doi:10.1080/10437797.2014.947161
Boitel, C., Farkas, K., Fromm, L., & Hokenstad, M. C. (2009). Learning transfer principles in a comprehensive integration model. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29(4), 400–417. doi:10.1080/08841230903249687
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Introduction—Assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud & N. Falchkov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3–13). London, UK: Routledge.
Boud, D., Sadler, R., Joughin, G., James, R., Freeman, M., Kift, S., & Dochy, F. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education (pp. 4). Sydney, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89. doi:10.1080/02602930801895786
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817–831. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002
Crisp, B. & Fox, J. (2012). Negotiating the university environment: How first year students learn about university processes.
Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 14(1), 39–51.
Crisp, B. R., & Green Lister, P. (2002). Assessment methods in social work education: A review of the literature. Social Work Education, 21(2), 259–269.
Crisp, B. R., Green Lister, P., & Dutton, K. (2006). Not just social work academics: The involvement of others in the assessment of social work students. Social Work Education, 25(7), 723–734.
Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 599–616. doi:10.1177/1077800407301175
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–11.
Fletcher, R., Meyer, L., Anderson, H., Johnston, P., & Rees, M. (2012). Faculty and students conceptions of assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 64(1), 119–133. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9484-1
Gillett, A., & Hammond, A. (2009). Mapping the maze of assessment: An investigation into practice. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 120–137. doi:10.1177/1469787409104786
Gray, M., & Gibbons, J. (2002). Experience based learning and its relevance to social work practice. Australian Social Work, 55(4), 279–291. doi:10.1080/03124070208410986
Greenwood, E. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2(3), 45–55. doi:10.1093/sw/2.3.45
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776
Heggen, K., & Terum, L. I. (2013). Coherence in professional education: Does it foster dedication and identification? Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 656–669. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774352
Holosko, M., Skinner, J., MacCaughelty, C., & Stahl, K. M. (2010). Building the implicit BSW curriculum at a large southern state university. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 411–423.
Jordan, J., & Ono, L. (2011). Using student focus groups in curriculum review. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(25), 1–13.
Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning.
Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263. doi:10.1177/1469787408095849
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. Laragy, C., Bland, R., Giles, R., & Scott, V. (2013). Australian practice standards nine years on: Are they useful?
International Social Work, 56(5), 644–658. doi:10.1177/0020872812436623
Larrison, T., & Korr, W. S. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206. doi:10.1080/10437797.2013.768102
Maclellan, E. (2004). Authenticity in assessment tasks: A heuristic exploration of academics' perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 19–33. doi:10.1080/0729436032000168478
Moseley, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2013). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007)
– Updated December 2013. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_national_ statement_140130.pdf
Norton, L., Richardson, T., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537–571. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z
Rae, A. M., & Cochrane, D. K. (2008). Listening to students: How to make written assessment feedback useful. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 217–230. doi:10.1177/1469787408095847
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 299–325. doi:10.1023/A:1004130031247
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201. doi:10.1023/a:1013796916022
Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24(1), 93–111. doi:10.2307/3447619
Savaya, R. (2001). Development of a model for evaluating social work curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 21(3–4), 205–216. doi:10.1300/J067v21n03_15
Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods.
British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 995–1015. doi:10.1080/01411920903342038
Seaman, M. (2011). Bloom’s taxonomy: Its evolution, revision, and use in the field of education. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 13, 29–43.
Sewpaul, V., & Jones, D. (2004). Global standards for social work education and training. Social Work Education, 23(5), 493–513. doi:10.1080/0261547042000252244
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Conducting the focus group. In D. W. Stewart, P. N. Shamdasani, & D. W. Rook (Eds.), Focus groups (2nd ed., pp. 89–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Taras, M., & Davies, M. S. (2013). Perceptions and realities in the functions and processes of assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 51–61. doi:10.1177/1469787412467128
Tatto, M. T. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 155–180. doi:10.2307/1164554
Thomas, G. (2013). How to do your research project: A guide for students in education and applied social sciences (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Tsang, N. M. (2007). Orality and literacy. Journal of Social Work, 7(1), 51–70. doi:10.1177/1468017307075989 Tsang, N. M. (2013). Knowledge, professional and practice integration in social work education.
British Journal of Social Work. 44, 1384–1401. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs195
Watts, L. & Hodgson, D. (2015). Whole curriculum mapping of assessment: Cartographies of assessment and learning.
Social Work Education. 34(6), pp. 682-699. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2015.1048217
Watts, L. & Hodgson, D. (2014). Mapping social work assessments at Edith Cowan University: Researching the alignment of assessments with the Australian Qualifications Framework and the Australian Association of Social Workers education and practice standards. Unpublished Report. Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
Ylijoki, O. (2000). Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying: A case-study of four Finnish university departments.
Higher Education, 39(3), 339–362. doi:10.1023/a:1003920230873
Copyright (c) 2016 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.